Summary
The Ohio Court of Appeals, Eleventh District reversed the lower court’s distributive award because the trial court treated the shareholder loans as debts of the parties’ business, but did not correspondingly treat the loans as personal assets of parties.
James M. Rosenberger v. Hollis Rosenberger
PDF, Size: 58 KB
See Also
Treatment of Shareholder Loans and Future Tax Consequences Considered
The Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District, reversed the lower court’s distributive award because the trial court treated the shareholder loans as debts of the parties’ business, but did not correspondingly treat the loans as personal assets of parties.