Summary
The Washington Court of Appeals, Division I ruled that a business concept for the manufacture of a synthetic cork conceived during the marriage, but not disclosed as an asset of the marriage was not an asset of value. It determined that the husband was no ...
Indra Ozolnieks-Burnell v. Steve Burnell
PDF, Size: 26 KB
See Also
Failure to Present Expert Testimony Regarding the Value of a Business Concept Resulted in Dismissal
The Washington Court of Appeals, Division I ruled that a business concept for the manufacture of a synthetic cork conceived during the marriage, but not disclosed as an asset of the marriage was not an asset of value.