In re Washington Mutual, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 7, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (34,390 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6035 Savings Institutions, Federally Chartered
522110 Commercial Banking
bankruptcy
In re Washington Mutual, Inc.
2011 WL 4090757 (Bkrtcy.D.Del.)
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States Bankruptcy Court
Steven Zelin (debtors); Peter Maxwell (plan objectors)
Walrath

Summary

Federal bankruptcy court criticizes debtors’ valuation of its proposed reorganization for being too low and plan objectors value for being too high, ultimately crediting the debtors’ more “complete” valuation, with adjustments.
In re Washington Mutual, Inc.
PDF, Size: 290 KB

See Also

WaMu Bankruptcy Court Credits the More ‘Complete’ Valuation

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2011

Federal bankruptcy court criticizes debtors’ valuation of its proposed reorganization for being too low and plan objectors value for being too high, ultimately crediting the debtors’ more “complete” valuation, with adjustments.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar