In re Toys “R” Us, Inc., Shareholder Litigation

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 22, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (27,232 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5945 Hobby, Toy, and Game Shops
451120 Hobby, Toy, and Game Stores
breach of fiduciary duty
control premium, gordon growth model, discounted cash flow (DCF), comparable transactions method
In re Toys “R” Us, Inc., Shareholder Litigation
2005 Del. Ch. LEXIS 90
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
A. Rick Atwood Jr., Andre G. Bouchard, Carmella P. Keener, Darren J. Robbins, Edward B. Micheletti, Emily C. Komlossy, James A. Whitney, Jerry C. Harris, Joel Friedlander, Joel H. Bernstein, Jon E. Abramczyk, Joseph M. McLaughlin, Kay P. Lawson, Martin
Credit Suisse First Boston
Strine

Summary

One of the issues was whether the board’s financial advisor, Credit Suisse First Boston (First Boston), correctly excluded a control premium in its assessment of the company’s value, and, thus, whether the board failed to reasonably consider the value of ...
In re Toys “R” Us, Inc., Shareholder Litigation
PDF, Size: 233 KB

See Also

Control Premium Not Needed for DCF Analysis Using Gordon Growth Model

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2005

One of the issues was whether the board’s financial advisor, Credit Suisse First Boston (First Boston), correctly excluded a control premium in its assessment of the company’s value and, thus, whether the board failed to reasonably consider the value of all relevant alternatives.

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel