In re the Marriage of Deviny

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 26, 2002

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,012 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2678 Stationery, Tablets, and Related Products
322230 Stationery Product Manufacturing
marital dissolution/divorce
In re the Marriage of Deviny
2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1297
US
State Court
Minnesota
Court of Appeals
Andrew Finger, CPA (for husband); King & Associates (for husband); Robert Greenwald, CPA (for wife)
Hudson

Summary

Issues in this case were whether the trial court valued husband's stock options as of the incorrect valuation date, and whether it incorrectly valued the options on a pretax basis.

See Also

Trial court erred in valuing stock options on pretax basis

Legal and Court Case Update
March 2003

Two of the issues in this case were whether the trial court valued husband's stock options as of the incorrect valuation date, and whether it incorrectly valued the options on a pretax basis.