In re PNB Holding Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 18, 2006

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (23,792 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6022 State Commercial Banks
522110 Commercial Banking
shareholder dissent/oppression
In re PNB Holding Co.
2006 Del. Ch. LEXIS 158
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Annaliese F. Fleming, Arthur T. Susman, Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum, Bruce E. Jameson, John R. Wylie, Matthew Hurst, Matthew T. Heffner, Ronald A. Brown Jr., Thomas A. Beck, W. Scott Porterfield
David Clarke (plaintiffs); Chris Hargrove (defendant)
Strine

Summary

Delaware Chancery prefers traditional DCF analysis over market approaches to calculate fair value for merger price.
In re PNB Holding Co.
PDF, Size: 194 KB

See Also

Delaware Chancery Prefers 'Traditional’ Over ‘Intuitive’ DCF in Appraisal Action

Legal and Court Case Update
March 2007

Delaware Chancery prefers traditional DCF analysis over market approaches to calculate fair value for merger price.

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel