In re PLX Tech. Stockholders Litig.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 16, 2018
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits, breach of fiduciary duty
beta, fair value, mergers and acquisitions (M&A), breach of fiduciary duty, discounted cash flow (DCF), statutory appraisal, projections, market forces

In re PLX Tech. Stockholders Litig.
2018 Del. Ch. LEXIS 336
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Ronald Quintero (plaintiffs); Neil Beaton (defendant)
Laster

Summary

Chancery says plaintiffs proved directors breached fiduciary duties and duty to disclose but failed to prove damages; court rejects plaintiff expert's DCF analysis, noting problematic projections and beta; “real-world market evidence” shows company was not worth more than deal price.
In re PLX Tech. Stockholders Litig.
PDF, Size: 803 KB

See Also

‘Real-World Market Evidence’ Does Not Support Dissenters’ Damages Claim, Chancery Says

Chancery says plaintiffs proved directors breached fiduciary duties and duty to disclose but failed to prove damages; court rejects plaintiff experts’ DCF analysis, noting problematic projections and beta; “real-world market evidence” shows company was not worth more than deal price.