In re Oneida Ltd.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 30, 2006

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (9,240 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3914 Silverware, Plated Ware, and Stainless Steel Ware
332215 Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and Flatware (except Precious) Manufacturing
bankruptcy
In re Oneida Ltd.
2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1985
US
Federal Court
New York
United States Bankruptcy Court
Andrew Dash, Andrew K. Glenn, Bryan R. Kaplan, David C. Albalah, Douglas P. Bartner, Emilio A. Galvan, Jay Teitelbaum, Lawrence F. Landgraff, Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Lynette C. Kelly, Mark E. Palmer, Michael H. Torkin, Richard C. Morrissey, Richard S. Toder
Credit Suisse (Debtors); Alvarez & Marsal (Lenders); Imperial Capital, LLC (Equity Committee); and Mesirow Financial Consulting, LLC (rebuttal)
Gropper

Summary

In reorganization confirmation, Bankruptcy Court rejects DCF analysis for cost of debt based on comparable companies rather than actual exit facility.
In re Oneida Ltd.
PDF, Size: 64 KB

See Also

Discovered Emails Plus a Contingent Fee Discredit Appraiser’s DCF Analysis

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2006

In reorganization confirmation, Bankruptcy Court rejects DCF analysis for cost of debt based on comparable companies rather than actual exit facility.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition