Summary
This case was important because: (1) the court rejected a jury award because the jury did not follow the judge’s instructions and the award could not be derived from the evidence; and (2) the judge, post-trial, excluded two witnesses under Rule 702, finding their methodologies to be unreliable.
In re NFL “Sunday Ticket” Antitrust Litig.
PDF, Size: 311 KB
See Also
U.S. District Court (California) Overturns Jury’s $4.7 Billion Award in a Post-Trial Motion and Excludes Witnesses Under Rule 702
This case was important because: (1) the court rejected a jury award because the jury did not follow the judge’s instructions and the award could not be derived from the evidence; and (2) the judge, post-trial, excluded two witnesses under Rule 702, finding their methodologies to be unreliable.