In re Mercury Companies, Inc. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 9, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,773 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6361 Title Insurance
524127 Direct Title Insurance Carriers
bankruptcy
expert testimony, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), discounted cash flow (DCF), fair market value (FMV), fraudulent transfer, reasonably equivalent value
In re Mercury Companies, Inc. (II)
2015 Bank. LEXIS 3443
US
Federal Court
Colorado
United States Bankruptcy Court
Neil H. Demchick (plaintiff); Scott P. Peltz (defendants)
Romero

Summary

On remand, Bankruptcy Court determines sale of plaintiff’s subsidiaries to defendants yielded “reasonably equivalent value” when viewed from objective creditor’s perspective, under FMV standard and without considering debtor’s subjective needs or beliefs.
In re Mercury Cos. (II)
PDF, Size: 145 KB

See Also

‘Reasonably Equivalent Value’ Analysis Meets FMV Standard, Court Says

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2016

On remand, Bankruptcy Court determines sale of plaintiff’s subsidiaries to defendants yielded “reasonably equivalent value” when viewed from objective creditor’s perspective, under FMV standard and without considering debtor’s subjective needs or beliefs.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition