In re Mauer

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 25, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,266 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8042 Offices and Clinics of Optometrists
621320 Offices of Optometrists
marital dissolution/divorce
divorce, enterprise goodwill, income approach, asset approach, professional practice, future income, double counting
In re Mauer
2015 Iowa App. LEXIS 172
US
State Court
Iowa
Court of Appeals
Dennis Redmond (wife); Eric Engstrom (husband)
Doyle

Summary

Appeals court affirms trial court’s decision favoring asset approach for valuing owner spouse’s medical practices; unlike income approach, it avoids accounting for owner spouse’s future earning twice, in asset valuation and determination of alimony.
In re Mauer
PDF, Size: 188 KB

See Also

Asset Approach Avoids Double Counting of Future Earnings

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2015

Appeals court affirms trial court’s decision favoring asset approach for valuing owner spouse’s medical practices; unlike income approach, it avoids accounting for owner spouse’s future earning twice, in asset valuation and determination of alimony.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium