In re Groupon Secs. Litig.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 14, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,664 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7319 Advertising, NEC
541890 Other Services Related to Advertising
securities litigation
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, reliability, securities fraud
In re Groupon Secs. Litig.
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27334
US
Federal Court
Illinois
United States District Court
Steven P. Feinstein (plaintiffs/investors); Dr. Paul A. Gompers (defendants/company)
Rowland

Summary

Court rebuffs Daubert challenge to investor expert’s efficient market opinion, saying securities law only requires showing that false statements affected stock price and caused loss to investors, not that market perfectly reflected all public information.
In re Groupon Securities Litigation
PDF, Size: 210 KB

See Also

Fraud Litigation Highlights Dispute Over ‘Market Efficiency’

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2015

Court rebuffs Daubert challenge to investor expert’s efficient market opinion, saying securities law only requires showing that false statements affected stock price and caused loss to investors, not that market perfectly reflected all public information.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition