In re Global Technovations, Inc. (III)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 13, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,043 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3651 Household Audio and Video Equipment
334310 Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing
bankruptcy
In re Global Technovations, Inc. (III)
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19209
US
Federal Court
6th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Van Conway (debtor); Jeff Risius (defendants)
Boggs

Summary

Sixth Circuit finds expert’s examination of post-hoc transaction in using market approach did not involve improper hindsight.
In re Global Technovations, Inc. (III)
PDF, Size: 85 KB

See Also

6th Circuit Upholds Using Post Hoc Comparable Transaction

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2012

Sixth Circuit finds expert’s examination of post-hoc transaction in using market approach did not involve improper hindsight.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition