In re EM Lodgings, LLC

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 25, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,902 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7011 Hotels and Motels
721110 Hotels (except Casino Hotels) and Motels
bankruptcy
discount rate, expert testimony, capitalization rate, cash flow, discounted cash flow (DCF), liquidation, reorganization, projections, market value, going concern value, equity value, income capitalization
In re EM Lodgings, LLC
2018 Bank. LEXIS 183
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Bankruptcy Court
Nina Owen (debtor); Jonathan Jaeger (creditor)
Perkins

Summary

In granting creditor’s stay relief motion, court averages competing expert valuations and finds debtor has no equity in contested hotel; court says value gap is result of experts’ legitimate disagreements over hotel’s future performance as reflected in inputs for DCF-based analyses.
In re EM Lodgings, LLC
PDF, Size: 228 KB

See Also

Court Accords Equal Weight to Competing DCF-Based Hotel Valuations

Court Case Digests
January 25, 2018

In granting creditor’s stay relief motion, court averages competing expert valuations and finds debtor has no equity in contested hotel; court says value gap is result of experts’ legitimate disagreements over hotel’s future performance as reflected in inputs for DCF-based analyses.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law