Summary
Trial court did not err when it enforced shareholder agreement lacking purchase price and based buyout price on defense expert testimony; opposing expert committed “severe flaws in his methodology and the valuations based upon them,” appeals court says.
In re Discontinuance & Disposition of P.K. Smith Motors, Inc.
PDF, Size: 128 KB
See Also
Dodgy Real Estate Valuation Compromises Dependent Business Valuation
Trial court did not err when it enforced shareholder agreement lacking purchase price and based buyout price on defense expert testimony; opposing expert committed “severe flaws in his methodology and the valuations based upon them,” appeals court says.