In re CSC Industries, Inc. (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Kathryn A. Belfance, Trustee)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 24, 2007

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,462 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
Federal Court
6th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals

Summary

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's use of the prudent investor rate in calculating the present value of an unfunded pension liability claim.
In re CSC Industries, Inc. (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Kathryn A. Belfance, Trustee)
PDF, Size: 33 KB

See Also

Unfunded Pension Claim Valued Using Prudent Investor Rate

Legal and Court Case Update
June 7, 2007

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's use of the prudent investor rate in calculating the present value of an unfunded pension liability claim.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition