In re Cole

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 24, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase.   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8021 Offices and Clinics of Dentists
621210 Offices of Dentists
bankruptcy
enterprise goodwill, intrinsic value, liquidation, minority interest, professional practice, reorganization, standard of value, chapter 7 bankruptcy, creditor
In re Cole
2016 Bankr. LEXIS 932
US
Federal Court
Virginia
United States Bankruptcy Court
Robert Raymond (wife/creditor); Dean Heinberg, Bruce Matson (husband/debtor)
Phillips

Summary

Bankruptcy Court says differing standard of value in divorce and bankruptcy proceedings precludes use of divorce valuation of husband’s interest in dental practice; but valuation based on shareholder agreement accords with Chapter 7 liquidation analysis.
In re Cole
PDF, Size: 173 KB

See Also

Why Divorce Valuation Does Not Accord With Chapter 7 Liquidation Analysis

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2016

Bankruptcy Court says differing standard of value in divorce and bankruptcy proceedings precludes use of divorce valuation of husband’s interest in dental practice; but valuation based on shareholder agreement accords with Chapter 7 liquidation analysis.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium