In re Cencom Cable Income Partners, LP

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 3, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,527 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
shareholder dissent/oppression
In re Cencom Cable Income Partners, LP
2011 WL 2178825
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Mark Thaw (plaintiffs); and Melvin Fineberg, Daniels & Associates, and Kane (defendants)
Noble

Summary

DE Chancery Court finds price and process for sale of cable TV systems was fair, despite contemporaneous valuation that appraised the systems individually rather than on aggregate, and did not expressly include or quantify synergies.
In re Cencom Cable Income Partners, LP
PDF, Size: 99 KB

See Also

Synergies Lie at Core of Cable TV Systems Sale

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2011

Delaware Chancery Court finds price and process for sale of cable TV systems was fair, despite contemporaneous valuation that appraised the systems individually rather than on aggregate, and did not expressly include or quantify synergies.

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel