In re Appraisal of Jarden Corp. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 16, 2019

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,751 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6719 Offices of Holding Companies, NEC
551112 Offices of Other Holding Companies
shareholder dissent/oppression
expert testimony, size premium, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), cash flow, discounted cash flow (DCF), event study, statutory appraisal, multiple, synergy, equity risk premium (ERP), market value, comparable companies method, efficient market, unaffected market price
In re Appraisal of Jarden Corp. (II)
2019 Del. Ch. LEXIS 994
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Dr. Mark Zmijewski (petitioners); Dr. Glenn Hubbard (company/respondents)
Edwards

Summary

Responding to petitioners’ motion for reargument, court concedes and corrects errors in court’s original DCF analysis but finds corrected DCF model still corroborates the original fair value determination; court affirms its reliance on unaffected market price as fair value indicator.
Jarden Appraisal Motion Reconsid
PDF, Size: 2,432 KB

See Also

Court Says Corrected DCF Still Supports Original Fair Value Determination

Court Case Digests
September 16, 2019

Responding to petitioners’ motion for reargument, court concedes and corrects errors in court’s original DCF analysis but finds corrected DCF model still corroborates the original fair value determination; court affirms its reliance on unaffected market price as fair value indicator.