Iacampo v. Oliver-Iacampo

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 23, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (11,541 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2752 Commercial Printing, Lithographic
323111 Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books)
marital dissolution/divorce
passive appreciation, active appreciation
Iacampo v. Oliver-Iacampo
2012 Ohio. App. LEXIS 1574
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Robert Turner (wife)
Trapp

Summary

Appellate court affirms expert testimony regarding factors that contributed to active vs. passive appreciation of the marital business; even though his report didn’t make specific conclusions, it did apply a 10% discount for lack of control, which, while ...
Iacampo v. Oliver-Iacampo
PDF, Size: 117 KB

See Also

Minority Discount Can Help Determine Passive Versus Active Appreciation

Legal and Court Case Update
August 2012

Appellate court affirms expert testimony regarding factors that contributed to active vs. passive appreciation of the marital business; even though his report didn’t make specific conclusions, it did apply a 10% discount for lack of control, which, while ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition