Hultz v. Kuhn

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 21, 2019

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,815 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
0783 Ornamental Shrub and Tree Services
561730 Landscaping Services
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, income approach, pratt's stats, admissibility, asset approach, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), fair market value (FMV), marital dissolution, market approach, speculative, dealstats
Hultz v. Kuhn
2019 Md. App. LEXIS 151, 2019 WL 852109
US
State Court
Maryland
Court of Special Appeals
Charles McBee (husband); Jeffrey Barsky (wife)
Beachley

Summary

Appellate court finds no error in trial court’s adoption of market-based value determination by husband’s expert; expert acknowledged this was not the preferred method to value the small company, but company’s problematic financials and uncooperative attitude “compelled” use of this approach.
Hultz v Kuhn
PDF, Size: 170 KB

See Also

Pratt’s Stats/DealStats Market Analysis Survives Appeal by Owner Spouse

Court Case Digests
February 21, 2019

Appellate court finds no error in trial court’s adoption of market-based value determination by husband’s expert; expert acknowledged this was not the preferred method to value the small company, but company’s problematic financials and uncooperative attitude “compelled” use of this approach.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition