Holiday Medical Center v. Weisman (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 10, 2008

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,431 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8051 Skilled Nursing Care Facilities
shareholder dissent/oppression
Holiday Medical Center v. Weisman (I)
2008 WL 2677504
US
State Court
New Jersey
Superior Court
J. Bradford McIlvain
CBIZ Valuation Group, LLC
Parrillo, Gilroy, Baxter

Summary

New Jersey court considers whether “highest and best use” is appropriate standard in shareholder dissent cases.
Holiday Medical Center v. Weisman (I)
PDF, Size: 62 KB

See Also

Should ‘Highest and Best Use’ Govern Fair Value Standard in Dissenting Shareholder Case?

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2008

New Jersey court considers whether “highest and best use” is appropriate standard in shareholder dissent cases.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium