Summary
In fraudulent conveyance suit, federal bankruptcy court rejects cost approach and “hypothetical capitalization of income approach” to value a unique technology that nevertheless never made any profit in the history of the debtor’s business.
Holber v. M&T Bank (In re Scheffler)
PDF, Size: 2,797 KB
See Also
Cost Method ‘Strikingly Inappropriate’ to Value Technology
In fraudulent conveyance suit, federal bankruptcy court rejects cost approach and “hypothetical capitalization of income approach” to value a unique technology that nevertheless never made any profit in the history of the debtor’s business.