Hicks Oil & Butane Co. v. George Garza

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 9, 2006

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,137 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5541 Gasoline Service Stations
447110 Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores
contract
lost profits, economic damages & lost profits
Hicks Oil & Butane Co. v. George Garza
No. 04-05-00836-CV (Tex. App. 4 Dist. 2006)
US
State Court
Texas
Court of Appeals
Marion

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals, Fourth District, reversed a lost profits award to a gasoline dealer because the lost profits evidence was speculative.
Hicks Oil & Butane Co. v. George Garza
PDF, Size: 215 KB

See Also

Lost Profits Award Must Be Supported by Objective Facts and Data

Legal and Court Case Update
August 9, 2006

The Texas Court of Appeals, Fourth District, reversed a lost profits award to a gasoline dealer because the lost profits evidence was speculative.