Herbert v. Joubert

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 14, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,917 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7389 Business Services, NEC
541199 All Other Legal Services
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, separate property, residual method, marital property, appreciation analysis, revenue
Herbert v. Joubert
2018 Va. App. LEXIS 222
US
State Court
Virginia
Court of Appeals
Harold Martin (husband); unknown (wife)
Decker

Summary

In quantifying marital portion of appreciation of owner spouse’s separate property, trial court relies on owner’s “proportionate” share in company but also considers expert testimony as to third parties’ efforts and owner’s role in generating revenue; court rejects passive factor analysis.
Herbert v. Joubert
PDF, Size: 112 KB

See Also

Court Looks to Owner’s ‘Proportionate’ Share in Business to Quantify Appreciation in Value

Court Case Digests
August 14, 2018

In quantifying marital portion of appreciation of owner spouse’s separate property, trial court relies on owner’s “proportionate” share in company but also considers expert testimony as to third parties’ efforts and owner’s role in generating revenue; court rejects passive factor analysis.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition