Henley Mining v. Parton

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 3, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,346 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3532 Mining Machinery and Equipment, Except Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment
333131 Mining Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
shareholder dissent/oppression
discount for lack of control (DLOC), expert testimony, fair value, net asset value, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), dissenting shareholder, going concern, liquidation, statutory appraisal
Henley Mining v. Parton
2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139692
US
Federal Court
Kentucky
United States District Court
Unknown (plaintiff/company); Basil Jefferson Grizzle, John Herring (defendant/dissenting shareholder)
Van Tatenhove

Summary

In statutory appraisal case, court denies summary judgment motion arguing opposing expert’s valuation fails to meet legal definition of fair value, i.e., “the value of the company as a whole and as a going concern”; court says controlling case law does not preclude use of net asset value method.
Henley Mining v. Parton
PDF, Size: 186 KB

See Also

Fair Value Standard Does Not Preclude Use of Net Asset Approach, Court Affirms

Court Case Digests
August 3, 2020

In statutory appraisal case, court denies summary judgment motion arguing opposing expert’s valuation fails to meet legal definition of fair value, i.e., “the value of the company as a whole and as a going concern”; court says controlling case law does not preclude use of net asset value method.