Henke v. Trilithic, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 28, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,473 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3823 Industrial Instruments for Measurement, Display, and Control of Process Variables; and Related Products
shareholder dissent/oppression
Henke v. Trilithic, Inc.
No. 13155 (Del. Chan. 2005)
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Thomas G. Whalen Jr.
R. Victor Haas, ASA <br> Brett Margolin, Ph.D. <br>
Parsons, Jr.

Summary

The Delaware Court of Chancery determined the fair value of an interest in a financially troubled closely held electronics manufacturer using a discounted cash flow method. In performing the valuation, the court considered issues involving management proj ...
Henke v. Trilithic, Inc.
PDF, Size: 111 KB

See Also

Delaware Sees DCF Approach as Best for Appraisal Action

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2006

The principal issue in this appraisal action was the fair value of dissenters’ stock in Trilithic Inc. (Trilithic), a close corporation that had merged with and into another corporation of the same name.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel