Hebert v. Cote

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 29, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,378 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7371 Computer Programming Services
541511 Custom Computer Programming Services
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, fair market value (FMV), SSVS-1, appreciation, separate property, valuation date, marital property
Hebert v. Cote
Case No. 312017DR000305, Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Indian River County Florida (Order 5/29/2018 and Order 8/29/2018)
US
State Court
Florida
Circuit Court
Charles Clay Price (wife); R. James Alerding (husband)
Pegg

Summary

In appreciation in value case, court excludes nonowner spouse’s valuation testimony under Daubert, finding expert’s calculation of “minimum marital component” is not a methodology approved under the applicable SSVS for determining fair market value and also violated other SSVS requirements.
Hebert v Cote-Order (5-29-18) Excluding Expert Testimony of Charles Clay Price re Valuation of Canix Colo
PDF, Size: 95 KB
Hebert v Cote-Order (8-29-18) Denying w's mtn to recall Clay Price
PDF, Size: 82 KB

See Also

Court Rejects Appreciation in Value Calculation, Citing SSVS Violations

Court Case Digests
May 29, 2018

In appreciation in value case, court excludes nonowner spouse’s valuation testimony under Daubert, finding expert’s calculation of “minimum marital component” is not a methodology approved under the applicable SSVS for determining fair market value and also violated other SSVS requirements.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition