Hayes v. Olmsted & Assoc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 28, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,617 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5141 Groceries, General Line
445110 Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
judicial dissolution
fair value, going concern, minority shareholder
Hayes v. Olmsted & Assoc.
173 Or. App. 259, 21 P.3d 178, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 404
US
State Court
Oregon
Court of Appeals
Brewer

Summary

Issues were whether majority's conduct toward minority stockholder was oppressive, the proper method of valuing minority's stock, and value of stock.

See Also

Fair Value in Oregon Shareholder Oppression Case Is Undiscounted Pro Rata Share of Going Concern Value

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2001

Plaintiff brought this action under the Oregon dissenters' rights statute, claiming oppressive conduct of the majority shareholders and requesting judicial dissolution of the subject company.

Value Under Shareholders’ Agreement Is Not Fair Value

Legal and Court Case Update
March 28, 2001

The Oregon Court of Appeals considered the fair value of a minority interest in a food brokerage business in this oppressed shareholder case.