Haupt v. Heaps

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 14, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,468 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7374 Computer Processing and Data Preparation and Processing Services
518210 Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services
fraud
Haupt v. Heaps
2005 Utah App. LEXIS 423
US
State Court
Utah
Court of Appeals
Allen K. Young, Curtis R. Hussey, Evan A. Schmutz, Jonah Orlofsky, William Kelly Nash
Paul A. Randle, Ph.D. and Curtis Bramble, CPA (plaintiff)
McHugh

Summary

Straight-Line Ramp-up (“SLR”) method to value stock fails under Daubert challenge ...
Haupt v. Heaps
PDF, Size: 38 KB

See Also

‘SLR’ Method to Value Stock Too Novel to Pass Daubert Challenge

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2006

Straight-line ramp-up (SLR) method to value stock fails under Daubert challenge.