Harold Tatum Jr. v. Patricia L. Tatum

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 2, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,619 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3500 Industrial machinery and equipment
333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing
marital dissolution/divorce
Harold Tatum, Jr. v. Patricia L. Tatum
No. 2001-CA-002140-MR (KY App. 2004), unpublished
US
State Court
Kentucky
Court of Appeals
J. Key Schoen, Joseph V. Mobley, Oliver B. Rutherford, Stephen J. Tillman
Steve Kerrick, CPA; Jim King; Bryan Livingston
Combs

Summary

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the valuation of a specialty machine business. The company was valued using the straight capitalization method and a 20 percent discount for lack of marketability. The court rejected in part the valuations performed ...
Harold Tatum, Jr. v. Patricia L. Tatum
PDF, Size: 30 KB

See Also

Straight Capitalization Method Used

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2, 2004

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the valuation of a specialty machine business.