Halliday v. Halliday

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 6, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (9,119 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6512 Operators of Nonresidential Buildings
531312 Nonresidential Property Managers
marital dissolution/divorce
discount for lack of control (DLOC), discount for lack of marketability (DLOM)
Halliday v. Halliday
2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 856
US
State Court
Tennessee
Court of Appeals
Robert E. Yates, II (husband); David C. Wood (wife)
Dinkins

Summary

Trial court did not overvalue husband’s interests in various businesses since it applied a DLOC whenever the husband did not have a 100% interest in the company and a DLOM that was consistent with expert testimony, state Court of Appeals finds.
Hallliday v Halliday
PDF, Size: 181 KB

See Also

Court’s Discount Rates Don’t Overvalue Business Interests

Legal and Court Case Update
March 2013

Trial court did not overvalue husband’s interests in various businesses since it applied a DLOC whenever the husband did not have a 100% interest in the company and a DLOM that was consistent with expert testimony, state Court of Appeals finds.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition