Grant v. Grant

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 12, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,600 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6552 Land Subdividers and Developers, Except Cemeteries
237210 Land Subdivision
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, appraisal, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), fair market value (FMV), minority discount, minority interest, real estate, hypothetical buyer, valuation date, discount for lack of control (DLOC)
Grant v. Grant
2016 Tenn. App. LEXIS 327
US
State Court
Tennessee
Court of Appeals
George Pritchett (appraiser, husband), Michael Wallace (valuation expert, husband); Mark Young, Larry Sharp (appraisers, wife), Scott Womack (valuation expert, wife)
McBrayer

Summary

Appeals court says use of DLOM in valuing interest for divorce depends on interest’s characteristics not owner’s intent to sell the interest, but appeals court affirms trial court’s decision to apply “slight” or no DLOM based on intent to sell analysis.
Grant v. Grant
PDF, Size: 211 KB

See Also

Appeals Court Signs Off on ‘Slight’ DLOM in Minority Interest Valuation

Legal and Court Case Update
August 2016

Appeals court says use of DLOM in valuing interest for divorce depends on interest’s characteristics not owner’s intent to sell the interest, but appeals court affirms trial court’s decision to apply “slight” or no DLOM based on intent to sell analysis.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition