Gallo v. Gallo

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 17, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,255 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
income approach, asset approach, capitalization of earnings, child support, closely held corporation, discounted cash flow (DCF), future income, valuation
Gallo v. Gallo
2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 938
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Brian Russell (husband); unknown (wife)
Klatt

Summary

Appeals court finds Ohio statute requires trial court to consider income from all sources in calculating spousal support and overrules Heller I to extent Heller imposes a flat prohibition against double dipping; mandate is to ensure fairness and equity.
Gallo v. Gallo
PDF, Size: 1,123 KB

See Also

Court Rejects Flat Prohibition Against Double Dipping

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2015

Appeals court finds Ohio statute requires trial court to consider income from all sources in calculating spousal support and overrules Heller I to extent Heller imposes a flat prohibition against double dipping; mandate is to ensure fairness and equity.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium