Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP v. Assam

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 3, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,783 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8111 Legal Services
541110 Offices of Lawyers
buy/sell agreement
discount rate, expert testimony, fair value, income approach, buyout, calculation report, cash flow, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), fair market value (FMV), minority interest, partnership agreement, valuation report, accounts receivable, pass-through entity, discount for lack of control (DLOC)
Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP v. Assam
2018 Neb. LEXIS 142
US
State Court
Nebraska
Supreme Court
William Brennan (plaintiff/firm); Chad Flanagan, Jay Fullerton [Eide Bailly] (defendant); Matthew Stadler (defendant); Fred Assam (defendant)
Funke

Summary

In buyout dispute over law firm interest, court credits firm’s expert, noting his extensive relevant experience, his taking care to value interest under fair market value standard, as required by the partnership agreement, and his detailed risk analysis to support a deep discount.
Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP v. Assam
PDF, Size: 376 KB

See Also

Expert’s Detailed Risk Analysis Bolsters Use of Deep Discount in Law Firm Valuation

Court Case Digests
August 3, 2018

In buyout dispute over law firm interest, court credits firm’s expert, noting his extensive relevant experience, his taking care to value interest under fair market value standard, as required by the partnership agreement, and his detailed risk analysis to support a deep discount.