Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 10, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,076 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
damages, patent infringement, royalty rate, expert testimony, reasonable royalty, royalty base, smallest salable unit, apportionment
Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc. (II)
2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 601
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Dr. Anne Layne-Farrar (plaintiff); Julie Davis (defendant)
Dyk

Summary

Federal Circuit strikes down portion of damages, finding expert’s royalty base was unsupported because she merely apportioned to the “smallest identifiable technical component,” which itself was a multicomponent software engine that performed both noninfringing and infringing functions.
Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Sys.
PDF, Size: 181 KB

See Also

Court Doubles Down on Apportionment for Multifunctional Smallest Salable Unit

Court Case Digests
January 10, 2018

Federal Circuit strikes down portion of damages, finding expert’s royalty base was unsupported because she merely apportioned to the “smallest identifiable technical component,” which itself was a multicomponent software engine that performed both noninfringing and infringing functions.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition