Farmer v. Farmer

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 8, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,422 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3537 Industrial Trucks, Tractors, Trailers, and Stackers
333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing
marital dissolution/divorce
damages, stock option
Farmer v. Farmer
2011 WL 3929114 (Wash.)
US
State Court
Washington
Supreme Court
Ronald Nelson (wife); Steven Kessler (husband)
Stephens

Summary

Washington State Supreme Court rejects absolute rule for valuing converted employment stock options in divorce, deferring to trial courts’ broad authority to assess expert valuation of the options, including its reference to the tort framework of measurin ...
Farmer v. Farmer
PDF, Size: 544 KB

See Also

Court Rejects ‘One Size Fits All’ Rule for Valuing Stock Options

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2011

Washington State Supreme Court rejects absolute rule for valuing converted employment stock options in divorce, deferring to trial courts’ broad authority to assess expert valuation of the options, including its reference to the tort framework of measurin ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition