Faircloth v. Lundy Packing

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 2, 1996

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,057 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2011 Meat Packing Plants
311611 Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering
ESOP valuations
disclosure, employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)
Faircloth v. Lundy Packing
91 F.3d 648, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19006
US
Federal Court
4th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Hamilton, Williams, Michael

Summary

At issue is whether the appellee, an ESOP administrator, should have furnished certain documents to the appellants, three participants in the ESOP.

See Also

More Court Cases … ESOP: Faircloth

Legal and Court Case Update
December 1996

The court found that Lundy Packing Co., the ESOP administrator and trustee, were not required to disclose the ESOP appraisal report, despite it being requested by the participants.