Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Corp. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 4, 2014

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (19,165 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7373 Computer Integrated Systems Design
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
intellectual property
damages, lost profits, patent infringement, georgia-pacific, reasonable royalty, apportionment, entire market value rule (EMVR), ieee standard
Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Corp. (II)
773 F.3d 1201
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Unknown (plaintiffs-appellees); unknown (defendants-appellants)
O’Malley

Summary

In dispute over infringement of standard-essential patent (SEP), Federal Circuit holds royalty must be apportioned to the value of the patented feature and must exclude any added value to the patented feature from standard’s widespread adoption.
Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Sys. (D-Link II)
PDF, Size: 427 KB

See Also

Pivotal Ruling on Damage Calculation for SEP Infringement

Legal and Court Case Update
April 2016

In dispute over infringement of standard-essential patent (SEP), Federal Circuit holds royalty must be apportioned to the value of the patented feature and must exclude any added value to the patented feature from standard’s widespread adoption.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition