Ergotron, Inc. v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, LLC

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 28, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,886 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2522 Office Furniture, Except Wood
337214 Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing
intellectual property
Ergotron, Inc. v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, LLC
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121795
US
Federal Court
Minnesota
United States District Court
Arthur Cobb (plaintiff); Melissa Snelson (defendant)
Montgomery

Summary

Federal district court finds “multitudinous” Georgia-Pacific factors allow for flexibility and permissible degree of imprecision in expert’s royalty rate analysis.
Ergotron, Inc. v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, LLC
PDF, Size: 77 KB

See Also

Georgia-Pacific Gives Experts ‘Multitudinous’ Leeway in Rate Analysis

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2012

Federal district court finds “multitudinous” Georgia-Pacific factors allow for flexibility and permissible degree of imprecision in expert’s royalty rate analysis.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition