Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. Sonic Innovations, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 7, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (14,381 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3842 Orthopedic, Prosthetic, and Surgical Appliances and Supplies
339113 Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing
intellectual property
Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. Sonic Innovations, Inc.
2011 WL 2222066 (D. Del.)
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
Terry Musika (plaintiff); Putnam (defendant)
Sleet

Summary

Federal district court affirms damages award for patent infringement despite jury “splitting the difference” between the parties’ experts’ reasonable royalty analyses.
Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. Sonic Innovations, Inc.
PDF, Size: 213 KB

See Also

Jury Splits the Difference Between Experts’ Reasonable Royalties

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2011

Bankruptcy court denies Daubert motion and grants summary judgment based largely on expert insolvency analysis, despite “professional” disagreement on data used to calculate small stock premium, cost of debt, and company-specific risk premium.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition