Emerald Partners v. Ronald P. Berlin, et al.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 28, 2003

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (30,274 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
shareholder dissent/oppression
Emerald Partners v. Ronald P. Berlin, et al.
No. 9700 (Del. Chan. 2003)
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Gregg Allen Jarrell <br> William H. Purcell <br> Donna Weintraub <br>
Jacobs

Summary

The Delaware Court of Chancery determined that a fairness opinion, obtained in conjunction with a stock for stock merger, was a fair representation of value to the shareholders. The shareholders brought suit against the defendant, contesting the valuatio ...
Emerald Partners v. Ronald P. Berlin, et al.
PDF, Size: 232 KB

See Also

Entire Fairness of Merger Considered

Legal and Court Case Update
April 28, 2003

The Delaware Court of Chancery determined that a fairness opinion, obtained in conjunction with a stock for stock merger, was a fair representation of value to the shareholders.

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel