Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 30, 2006

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (27,712 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
personal injury
deficiency, internal revenue code (IRC), appreciation analysis, hobby loss rule
Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu
2006 BCSC 522 (CanLII)
Canada
Federal Court
Supreme Court
Anthony A. Vecchio (for plaintiff); Mary-Helen Wright and Joseph P. Cahan (for defendant)
Baker

Summary

In Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu, 2006 BCSC 522 (CanLII) (decided March 30, 2006), the Supreme Court of British Columbia calculated. the lost past and future earnings of a medical doctor resulting from an auto accident.
Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu
PDF, Size: 225 KB

See Also

Foreign-Educated Doctor’s Lost Earnings Computed in Personal injury Action

Legal and Court Case Update
March 30, 2006

In Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu, 2006 BCSC 522 (CanLII) (decided March 30, 2006), the Supreme Court of British Columbia calculated. the lost past and future earnings of a medical doctor resulting from an auto accident.