Doyle v. Doyle

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 5, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,797 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2411 Logging
113310 Logging
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, capitalization of income approach, equitable distribution, operating assets
Doyle v. Doyle
2017 Mich. App. LEXIS 1401
US
State Court
Michigan
Court of Appeals
Paul Murray (joint husband/wife, business valuation), Paul Murray (wife, trial)
Per Curiam

Summary

Appeals court finds incongruities in trial court’s unreported cash income and profit rate inputs make court’s valuation of timber business meaningless; further, trial court failed to explain reason for equalization payment and arrived at incorrect amount.
Doyle v. Doyle
PDF, Size: 145 KB

See Also

Math and Logic Problems Mar Court’s Valuation and Division of Assets

Court Case Digests
September 5, 2017

Appeals court finds incongruities in trial court’s unreported cash income and profit rate inputs make court’s valuation of timber business meaningless; further, trial court failed to explain reason for equalization payment and arrived at incorrect amount.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition