Dixon v. Crawford, McGilliard, Peterson & Yelish

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 19, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,352 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8111 Legal Services
judicial dissolution
Dixon v. Crawford, McGilliard, Peterson & Yelish
2011 WL 4348058 (Wash. App. Div. 1)
US
State Court
Washington
Court of Appeals
Lawrence (plaintiff); James Weber, Steve Kessler, and Ronald Nelson
Ellington

Summary

Appellate court affirms goodwill value of a dissociated law partner’s interest in a well-established public defense firm under the capitalization of excess earnings method.
Dixon v. Crawford, McGilliard, Peterson & Yelish
PDF, Size: 47 KB

See Also

Lawyers Try Hard to Argue Their Firm Has No Goodwill Value

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2011

Appellate court affirms goodwill value of a dissociated law partner’s interest in a well-established public defense firm under the capitalization of excess earnings method.