Dietz v. Jacobs

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 21, 2014

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,856 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3732 Boat Building and Repairing
336612 Boat Building
bankruptcy
daubert, discounted cash flow (DCF), SSVS-1, solvency, fraudulent transfer, balance sheet, bankruptcy code
Dietz v. Jacobs
2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37144
US
Federal Court
Minnesota
United States District Court
Arthur C. Cobb (solvency-defendants); unknown (trustee)
Ericksen

Summary

Court finds solvency analysis is not subject to AICPA’s valuation standards and admits expert’s claim that “magnitude of excess” reflected in adjusted balance sheet numbers means assets exceeded liabilities.
Dietz v. Jacobs
PDF, Size: 256 KB

See Also

Court Admits Solvency Analysis Lacking Specific Valuation of Debtor

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2014

Court finds solvency analysis is not subject to AICPA’s valuation standards and admits expert’s claim that “magnitude of excess” reflected in adjusted balance sheet numbers means assets exceeded liabilities.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition