Summary
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed and remanded the Tax Court's decision reducing Dexsil's sec. 162 deduction because it found the CEO's compensation unreasonable. The Second Circuit ruled that the five step Rapco analysis applied ...
Dexsil Corporation (Dexsil II) v. CIR
PDF, Size: 47 KB
See Also
Hypothetical Investor Test Used When Determining Reasonable Compensation
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit reversed and remanded the Tax Court's decision reducing Dexsil's sec. 162 deduction because it found the CEO's compensation unreasonable.