Summary
Plaintiff keeps lost profits for patent infringement, but loses damages for “pull through” products and also millions in reasonable royalties, for failure to timely object to inconsistent jury verdict.
DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
PDF, Size: 198 KB
See Also
Failure to Object to Jury Award Loses Potential Millions in Royalties
Plaintiff keeps lost profits for patent infringement, but loses damages for “pull through” products and also millions in reasonable royalties, for failure to timely object to inconsistent jury verdict.