Danmark v. CMI USA, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 6, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,627 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7379 Computer Related Services, NEC
541519 Other Computer Related Services
intellectual property
damages, lost profits, patent infringement, royalty rate, expert testimony, georgia-pacific, reasonable royalty, but for causation
Danmark v. CMI USA, Inc.
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21672
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Dr. Nisha Mody (plaintiff); James Pampinella (defendants)
Taranto

Summary

Federal Circuit says expert’s royalty analysis was not improper “pseudo” lost profits analysis that tried to circumvent higher standard of proof, where expert considered plaintiff’s profits as one of many factors in her hypothetical-negotiation model.
Danmark v. CMI USA, Inc.
PDF, Size: 224 KB

See Also

Federal Circuit Discusses Rationale Behind Different Measures of Damages

Court Case Digests
December 6, 2016

Federal Circuit says expert’s royalty analysis was not improper “pseudo” lost profits analysis that tried to circumvent higher standard of proof, where expert considered plaintiff’s profits as one of many factors in her hypothetical-negotiation model.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition