Dana Corp. v. Microtherm, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 21, 2010

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (17,020 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5074 Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies (Hydronics)
423720 Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies (Hydronics) Merchant Wholesalers
economic damages & lost profits
damages, lost profits, patent infringement, patent
Dana Corp. v. Microtherm, Inc.
2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 408; 2010 WL 196939
US
State Court
Texas
Court of Appeals
Rodriguez

Summary

Court finds evidence of indivisible lost profits damages insufficient when law specifically requires a separate breakdown of damages caused by each defendant in breach of contract case.
Dana Corp. v. Microtherm, Inc. (unpub.)
PDF, Size: 296 KB

See Also

Loss of Multimillion-Dollar Damages Shows Appraisers’ Need to Know the Law of the Case

Legal and Court Case Update
April 2010

Court finds evidence of indivisible lost profits damages insufficient when law specifically requires a separate breakdown of damages caused by each defendant in breach of contract case.